Re: (ASCEND) Re-iterate: 6.1.3 does NOT fix IP address pool leak

[Jim Logan <jim@top.net>]

At 08:24 AM 6/27/98 -0400, you wrote:
>
>> In any case, I have installed rtk.m40/ftk.m40 on three MAX4048 and
>> the IP address pool leak continues to be an issue.  I am NOT
>> running anything special - simply using the MAX4048 as a
>> terminal server to provide Sync/Async dial-up through PRIs.
>> I am running RIPv2 as the routing protocol and I am using
>> stacking.
>
>Ascend engineering:  if it makes any difference, I am running RIP2,
>stacking as well and have also seen the pool leak continue with 6.1.3.
>
>Maybe the leak only exhibits itself with RIP2 & Stacking.
>

 We have no Stacking set, Rip=off, Rip2 Use Mutlicast=Yes  ...

And still the Ip Pool issue after Ftik.m40   (tho don't seem quite as
bad??) Hard to tell during low traffic periods.


***** Top Net InterNet Services *****
Omaha, Nebraska         Husker Heaven
www.top.net            (402) 291-1542
 Visit Our BBS at: www.hawgwild.com 
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

---

References:

• (ASCEND) Re-iterate: 6.1.3 does NOT fix IP address pool leak
• From: "John Coy (anc.net)" <jcoy@anc.net>
• Re: (ASCEND) Re-iterate: 6.1.3 does NOT fix IP address pool leak
• From: "David C. Troy" <dave@toad.net>

---

• Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) IP Address Pool for 1 login
• Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Re-iterate: 6.1.3 does NOT fix IP address pool leak
• Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Re-iterate: 6.1.3 does NOT fix IP address pool leak
• Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Re-iterate: 6.1.3 does NOT fix IP address pool leak
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread