Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (ASCEND) Who runs IDSL ?!?
At 08:30 PM 2/3/98 +0100, Winfried Haug wrote:
>Hello..
>
>> >wont help us....our dealer has a call open at ascend (#260843) but ascend
>> seems
>> >to be silent...
>
>> That ticket is assigned to our EuroTAC support, since it is originated
>> there *AND*
>> is in German.
>well i would like to explain the problem directly in english, but they force
>me to go over my dealer...
Not a problem, just that *I* cannot help at this point ;-(
>> >are we the only one using idsl ?
>>
>> There have been a few press releases about this....maybe in the Ascend
>> press-release
>> archive...
>no i have searched at www.ascend.com for IDSL i i found nearly nothing..
>
>but it is not only a idsl-problem but a ISDN Problem.
OK.
>Assuming i have a max4XXX with ONE E1 Port for dialin and dialout. Everything
>works fine... now i put in a 8-port ISDN BRI Card. I have some partners,
>which i want to call over one specific port of this BRI Card NOT over the
>E1.
>
>How can i do this ?
>
>Must i use trunk groups...
Yes.
>And the next question: why on earth does ascend use switched lines for
>idsl.? I think it is rather a nailed line...
Compatibility with ISDN TAs. Switched is more flexible when inter-operating
with a multitude of non-Ascend ISDN CPE.
>So my question: who has a isdl line running with
>
>(1) 128kb (MPP Session)
TR#2675 is open on this. An alternative/workaround is to use the
encapsulation MP.
>(2) the option to dial and open the line from both sides, not only from
> the pipeline...
That is not an option. The docs should make that clear.
>> I'll check into the ticket when it's been translated by our EuroTAC.
>>
>well the answer was:
>
>>>>This problem has been logged for the MAXTNT and remains outstanding at
this
>>>> time. It is likely that the MAX 4000 behaves in a similar way.
>>>>I will try to determine of this is the case.
Yes, I saw this too. The problem is with MP+ calls. MP calls do work just
fine.
>i wonder how ascend can sell anything which has been developped but
>not tested...
It *has* been tested in the field, but I think the MP+ feature was broken in
some recent release.
>hmmm and btw: ascend is heavily breaking germany an european
>laws if they offer in the public (eg over WWW) products which dont work
>like offered... and we trusted this informations and i really cant believe
>that there is NOBODY at ascend who could assist us or give us a sample
>configuration... this must be really difficult *smile* :-)
I'll touch base with the TAC contacts about the TR, and have someone
look into getting sample configurations.
Kevin
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
Follow-Ups:
References: