Re: (ASCEND) SNMP for Max4004

To: Brett Hawn <blh@staff.texas.net>, ascend-users@bungi.com
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) SNMP for Max4004
From: "Kevin A. Smith" <kevin@ascend.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 1998 16:50:18 -0800
In-Reply-To: <19980217201336.00775@staff.texas.net>
References: <3.0.5.32.19980217163136.00a6e6b0@spanky.ascend.com><01BD219C.215D7670@KPACKERT><01BD219C.215D7670@KPACKERT><19980115092600.18502@texas.net><3.0.5.32.19980217163136.00a6e6b0@spanky.ascend.com>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

At 08:13 PM 2/17/98 -0600, Brett Hawn wrote:
>This I doubt very much because I made it entirely clear that _ANY_ method of
>doing this via SNMP was acceptable as long as it was being done. I mentioned
>DoHangUp as the one I recall however if there was any way to do it at all I
>wanted to know. 

:-)

OK, you win, whose head should I remove, package and mail to you?

;-)


Kevin


++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

Follow-Ups:

Re: (ASCEND) SNMP for Max4004

From: Brett Hawn <blh@staff.texas.net>

References:

Re: (ASCEND) SNMP for Max4004

From: "Kevin A. Smith" <kevin@ascend.com>

RE: (ASCEND) SNMP for Max4004

From: Ken Packert <kpackert@ascend.com>

Re: (ASCEND) SNMP for Max4004

From: Brett Hawn <blh@texas.net>

Re: (ASCEND) SNMP for Max4004

From: Brett Hawn <blh@staff.texas.net>

Prev by Date: (ASCEND) Pipeline 50 to Max 4004(hung wan session)
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Ascend P75 configuration
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) SNMP for Max4004
Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) SNMP for Max4004
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread