Re: [VANILLA-LIST:3194] continuous scoring

To: <vanilla-list@us.netrek.org>
Subject: Re: [VANILLA-LIST:3194] continuous scoring
From: "Lee Crawford" <lcrawfor@csc.uvic.ca>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 09:12:16 -0700
Organization: Dept. of Computer Science
References: <20000516171238.C31663@us.netrek.org> <200005161442.e4GEgHN04896@denali.ccs.neu.edu> <20000515184354.A200482@cecum.vec.wfubmc.edu> <200005160603.e4G63X500555@denali.ccs.neu.edu> <20000516171238.C31663@us.netrek.org> <20000515184354.A200482@cecum.vec.wfubmc.edu> <200005160603.e4G63X500555@denali.ccs.neu.edu> <20000516114538.A200769@cecum.vec.wfubmc.edu>

> turned out to be true.  In last nights EE vs World game, the continuous
> score showed very interesting trends and ended up with (I believe) a
> final score that was more even than the planet count score.  Using
> absolutes, EE would have won.  Using a 1.5 planet margin, EE had a
> closer continuous score to an even tie.  I was very surprised at the
> impact (on the score) of a good bomber, too.

So what is the new (if just experimental) formula for scoring now?

Lee
aka
Crommie'

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [VANILLA-LIST:3194] continuous scoring
  - From: Dave Ahn <ahn@vec.wfubmc.edu>

References:
- Re: [VANILLA-LIST:3194] continuous scoring
  - From: James Cameron <quozl@us.netrek.org>
- Re: [VANILLA-LIST:3194] continuous scoring
  - From: Jeffrey Nowakowski <jeffno@ccs.neu.edu>
- continuous scoring
  - From: Dave Ahn <ahn@vec.wfubmc.edu>
- Re: [VANILLA-LIST:3194] continuous scoring
  - From: Jeffrey Nowakowski <jeffno@ccs.neu.edu>
- Re: [VANILLA-LIST:3194] continuous scoring
  - From: Dave Ahn <ahn@vec.wfubmc.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: [VANILLA-LIST:3194] continuous scoring
Next by Date: Re: [VANILLA-LIST:3194] continuous scoring
Prev by thread: Re: [VANILLA-LIST:3194] continuous scoring
Next by thread: Re: [VANILLA-LIST:3194] continuous scoring
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread